Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:102644
Return-Path: <lester@lsces.co.uk>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 98620 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2018 08:19:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 8 Jul 2018 08:19:09 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk designates 185.153.204.204 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk
X-Host-Fingerprint: 185.153.204.204 mail4.serversure.net Linux 2.6
Received: from [185.153.204.204] ([185.153.204.204:55745] helo=mail4.serversure.net)
by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
id DA/E7-55607-9F8C14B5 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sun, 08 Jul 2018 04:19:07 -0400
Received: (qmail 24380 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jul 2018 08:19:02 -0000
Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 24371, pid: 24375, t: 0.0724s
scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52/d:10677
Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.7?) (lester@lsces.co.uk@81.138.11.136)
by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 8 Jul 2018 08:19:02 -0000
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <CAF+90c_L7S+EB8YxdNNpNZ7NhhYwCbwEw5_TSnSwUNN-zLVvCg@mail.gmail.com>
<b4a9394a-184f-906a-0e34-c14cf8172666@gmail.com>
<CA+kxMuQk_5KJT5RPK6B2+4whS1Wz4NTxLDAhXkc0uSurxPNLPw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAESVnVrFsZCEbwTTs+ROF19nHh6=XN6dhHJqxVw5EKa5bK5ngA@mail.gmail.com>
<c2b3a7b2-b4b6-db88-a7c7-5a08fed0d8a4@telia.com>
<CAF+90c8tNO1SsMjGnW9tGPGHtY4kD07SNS-qC_LfkVXVsp0GUA@mail.gmail.com>
<10e578d7-7a24-3ca0-ca0d-d5ed1a39dca3@telia.com>
<80a8f588-05a3-48e5-bf40-bf1685b3105e@gmx.de>
<CAF+90c-gOKrnHtLv1oJuHQ9QWxYjEZHwAzzaUL0c18x48=HezQ@mail.gmail.com>
<bd79bc16-ff3d-1c9b-a775-9c50c422b8a2@gmx.de>
<CAESVnVpHhKPBsTQgu=4u3UPC1oF_e6-iW9_njbq+09WTQb+Oqw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAESVnVogxMdbdObdS2Kz-+WP5U=+VvzVXfr55Qy6iYNg=2Z-Wg@mail.gmail.com>
<5cc6a95f-0033-3a8e-2cd6-dc47d0a41730@gmx.de>
<CAESVnVoOD_SYHrwmgOKR+zyaDGwLd6SZigNrAv_vp1pFSeomdw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <65f1b8bc-a78f-39bc-a544-edcfa41a3119@lsces.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 09:19:02 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAESVnVoOD_SYHrwmgOKR+zyaDGwLd6SZigNrAv_vp1pFSeomdw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Typed Properties
From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine)
On 08/07/18 00:35, Sara Golemon wrote:
>> Personally, I think even independently of typed variables, typed properties feel like an 8.0 feature, not a 7.x feature.
>>
> I probably agree with you on that. (Again, still undecided).
The debate seems to assume that Typed Properties ARE a done deal even
without a vote? Personally I just feel all this is still going in the
wrong direction and trying to work out where to go next is still
detracting from getting new work done. In practice if I need 'typed'
anything, I need types that actually return an advantage, and
unrestricted 'int' and the like is NOT providing that!
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk