Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:102644 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98620 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2018 08:19:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Jul 2018 08:19:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk designates 185.153.204.204 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 185.153.204.204 mail4.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [185.153.204.204] ([185.153.204.204:55745] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DA/E7-55607-9F8C14B5 for ; Sun, 08 Jul 2018 04:19:07 -0400 Received: (qmail 24380 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jul 2018 08:19:02 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 24371, pid: 24375, t: 0.0724s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52/d:10677 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.7?) (lester@lsces.co.uk@81.138.11.136) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 8 Jul 2018 08:19:02 -0000 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <10e578d7-7a24-3ca0-ca0d-d5ed1a39dca3@telia.com> <80a8f588-05a3-48e5-bf40-bf1685b3105e@gmx.de> <5cc6a95f-0033-3a8e-2cd6-dc47d0a41730@gmx.de> Message-ID: <65f1b8bc-a78f-39bc-a544-edcfa41a3119@lsces.co.uk> Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 09:19:02 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Typed Properties From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) On 08/07/18 00:35, Sara Golemon wrote: >> Personally, I think even independently of typed variables, typed properties feel like an 8.0 feature, not a 7.x feature. >> > I probably agree with you on that. (Again, still undecided). The debate seems to assume that Typed Properties ARE a done deal even without a vote? Personally I just feel all this is still going in the wrong direction and trying to work out where to go next is still detracting from getting new work done. In practice if I need 'typed' anything, I need types that actually return an advantage, and unrestricted 'int' and the like is NOT providing that! -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk