Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:102628
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.15.19 as permitted sender)
To: Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net>
Cc: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>, "stas@php.net" <stas@php.net>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=c3=b6rn_Larsson?= <bjorn.x.larsson@telia.com>,
 Dan Ackroyd <danack@basereality.com>,
 Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>, Marco Pivetta
 <ocramius@gmail.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <CAF+90c_L7S+EB8YxdNNpNZ7NhhYwCbwEw5_TSnSwUNN-zLVvCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b4a9394a-184f-906a-0e34-c14cf8172666@gmail.com>
 <CA+kxMuQk_5KJT5RPK6B2+4whS1Wz4NTxLDAhXkc0uSurxPNLPw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAESVnVrFsZCEbwTTs+ROF19nHh6=XN6dhHJqxVw5EKa5bK5ngA@mail.gmail.com>
 <c2b3a7b2-b4b6-db88-a7c7-5a08fed0d8a4@telia.com>
 <CAF+90c8tNO1SsMjGnW9tGPGHtY4kD07SNS-qC_LfkVXVsp0GUA@mail.gmail.com>
 <10e578d7-7a24-3ca0-ca0d-d5ed1a39dca3@telia.com>
 <80a8f588-05a3-48e5-bf40-bf1685b3105e@gmx.de>
 <CAF+90c-gOKrnHtLv1oJuHQ9QWxYjEZHwAzzaUL0c18x48=HezQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <bd79bc16-ff3d-1c9b-a775-9c50c422b8a2@gmx.de>
 <CAESVnVpHhKPBsTQgu=4u3UPC1oF_e6-iW9_njbq+09WTQb+Oqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAESVnVogxMdbdObdS2Kz-+WP5U=+VvzVXfr55Qy6iYNg=2Z-Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5cc6a95f-0033-3a8e-2cd6-dc47d0a41730@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 22:46:48 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAESVnVogxMdbdObdS2Kz-+WP5U=+VvzVXfr55Qy6iYNg=2Z-Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: de-DE
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Typed Properties
From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker")

On 06.07.2018 at 21:35, Sara Golemon wrote:

>> It's up to a combination of internals@ opinion, and RM best-judgement.
>> I for one, see no issue with pushing FF out (we can do an alpha4, even
>> an alpha5).  On the other end we have the option of reducing the
>> number of RCs, or pushing GA by the same delay.  FTR; I'd favor
>> pushing GA out over shortening the RC cycle, but I wouldn't lose sleep
>> if we wanted to keep the GA date where it is.
>
> Just want to be annoying about this since the currently scheduled fork
> date for PHP-7.3 is 11 days off.

Thanks, Sara! :)

> 1/ Do we have *ANY* objections to additional alpha(s) to accommodate
> Typed Props? (I would propose two additional alphas)
> 2/ Do we actually need to hold a formal vote? (If so, that vote should
> start *now*)

For me: no and no.

> Assuming the answer to both questions is 'No'. I'd like to propose the
> 7.3 RMs update https://wiki.php.net/todo/php73 to reflect a new
> schedule with alpha4 and alpha5 and (provisionally) only four RCs to
> maintain the same GA date, but that we should revisit the topic
> sometime around the new RC2 date.

Why should we have 2 additional alphas?  In my opinion, a single
additional alpha is sufficient, and it is really important not to add
yet further features.

-- 
Christoph M. Becker