Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:102577
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.17.21 as permitted sender)
To: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <CAF+90c_+GZNrV1SC9q=Y3C=L3LMnoXX7J3zK6=kS9-sMXHZZow@mail.gmail.com>
 <c74272b2-ecb6-afc6-dc89-a4db44b8ee0d@gmx.de>
 <CAF+90c8J-E=-jYeNynkKdAW0q3fH0vKfhhxq4S=Ko2Yf+KuK=g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <51c155bc-1fab-655b-d08c-75f6cb28e2fb@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 17:23:24 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAF+90c8J-E=-jYeNynkKdAW0q3fH0vKfhhxq4S=Ko2Yf+KuK=g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: de-DE
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [RFC] Deprecations for PHP 7.3
From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker")

On 04.07.2018 at 16:07, Nikita Popov wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 10:29 PM, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 24.06.2018 at 18:47, Nikita Popov wrote:
>>
>>> This RFC collects a number of deprecations for PHP 7.3 which I consider
>> to
>>> be too minor to warrant a separate proposal. However, each deprecation
>> will
>>> still be voted separately.
>>>
>>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecations_php_7_3
>>
>> Thanks.  FWIW, I'm +1 on all 4 proposals.
>>
>>> If you have a minor deprecation in mind, but were too lazy to write an
>> RFC
>>> for it, please write me a mail until tomorrow, so that it might be
>> included
>>> as part of this proposal. As time is limited I don't want to include
>>> anything larger or controversial in this RFC though.
>>
>> I've recently submitted <https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/3322> to
>> deprecate FILTER_FLAG_SCHEME_REQUIRED and FILTER_FLAG_HOST_REQUIRED.  I
>> don't think this needs an RFC, but it might be something which could be
>> added to this RFC?
> 
> Procedural question: Would you prefer that the vote for this (and the other
> two deprecation RFCs) is one week (the minimum voting period), or that the
> vote is two weeks but the deprecations land for beta 2 rather than beta 1?

Hmm, it's probably best to ship the deprecations (if any) with beta1.
If the voting could be opened soon, there's still more than 1 week time.

-- 
Christoph M. Becker