Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:102249 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 39790 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2018 21:20:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Jun 2018 21:20:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.15.15 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.15.15] ([212.227.15.15:57213] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D3/45-29356-1BA812B5 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:20:50 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.114] ([79.222.35.93]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MaIPo-1fn4Sb3PjM-00JsUw; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 23:20:45 +0200 To: Stanislav Malyshev , PHP Internals References: <48abc798-1c2e-9d35-52db-a0f525fccb3b@gmail.com> Message-ID: <18ee1e31-c852-0124-9c21-8b4878f70f43@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 23:20:53 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <48abc798-1c2e-9d35-52db-a0f525fccb3b@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:QmabJOWOwkhsSEPxcXw37wRZX+4sr8JhycdqNpV6ZzzDEoPg1iv qryHaiLFdBS9wr5Iv14EzsYzp1FtV9AmGQcD2Ydohi37XZHMcWRDoU7PBIUMu5aFpMrCVID hM60VVvTaTTV5MylHMxU7gyCHTyCXzz1jlWknJ2ickj/yp5Rm9IRkWtuE1mxPVLF5/MxbZd HMryo3VMEjQYi68ozOwgw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:qHVojDKeA88=:dzxJWoV+5goWqWjuvvBXSL dRlYAPlY2pr3RvYSCTulbXsJPHAM4lHmrpiCxWQIPGlHUrbzlrSrJmspBZT7vJmVQBe2OVHPg DXpvwPwdjwkK6aolbGDyhaIpNVaSg5oZTtUJfMScPR0TRE1h+MHrpq+cH/5zwOvepN+TKSVty p+m0n6DNzxY24AXawshdrwBwsrigzTqQitnEGcAwxCNSnFPIQuKJBgwrsswvX2LnHzYNKjPMM 6D8Sginkh8YKbj3c77qBJA9thzQc/tTeLc1PHrIQJz0qtA79jFI/t4iSEHhGloeG6gYp0QkGv OR6T79ZCAKGdlxLdxsGNlhlnkt6w4dqqPAEOkIu1vyJThRbXUIG/YuAM+L6+vU+Z/rFbzaPWR RIM2WTKGqIA/WmE7TkAW5ZxkKEHVxB84Ai73iP74OWTndJ6sXQseG6LC/7Q/mQtizWq475yna VMd+xTbB6O1sUdsg8CyXgOj8kXO+oBZFuTftrUyZQC7QVinKKUf2hWAOureNMKPeLWsNnrxAT WndQbUKpK7fhG2MKdoqz8KIeDfUSdnBKt4rCv7Xw+rV8RxvsqnkQxXVJXoTykx4KC6VniRbNW PMph5qgVG6AoBpy53EhcMlQeIHWtelHTX18f1Bs4jBEepuvNIXyTZykq8yUG2Yjv0MIbqEsbl 6mPO1RDKTDNpF2T/gpzHXHrBf4vHex32BYldxycBFMfUHvGt3MTP45/MQWQYi3YJePwyHXjA6 TZqNB+aQOQlv4X6im7lVI1aZRzwrTnSN7AQLNVQeq0XDV9zD7TB34a7YiXzPSwWItwJhMFKwL xxv1FAk Subject: Re: [RFC] orphan extensions cleanup From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") On 12.06.2018 at 22:09, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > Yes, I think having some rules on maintainership would be nice, right > now I haven't even considered extensions which have maintainers listed > but no longer active, etc. - though I suspect those exist too. […] From looking at current EXTENSIONS[1], it seems to be rather the other way round, unfortunately. [1] -- Christoph M. Becker