Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:102106 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 59590 invoked from network); 11 May 2018 14:06:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 May 2018 14:06:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.15.15 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.15.15] ([212.227.15.15:52239] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0E/ED-47313-573A5FA5 for ; Fri, 11 May 2018 10:06:46 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.114] ([79.222.36.189]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M23zf-1eSkpe48qp-00u5K0 for ; Fri, 11 May 2018 16:06:42 +0200 X-Mozilla-News-Host: news://news.php.net:119 To: PHP Internals Message-ID: <4b1b1217-5ac6-8f38-47e8-02dba908efd3@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 16:06:41 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:wZZnw9SLfYtPdcOE0rDaNeQRYqn/B3UQviX4jiiHbTdx9K7I2Wx MV9yjZT64HwSmAGUcL6ZBGEY+CG5cgjl/mRuH+DUx9c3F7qpM9GUEQOo1FbUGUD7OLOqObd eWGmZEZ/YMPrMLJlZJ6Rh8ikmYgjnIeO+oZ2Y3hmVeFYgtqxxRXGRDxVO4twqVfcJgnxdsY Jcw2G28dBG+qNW+jtq5Nw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:fwoIc6W67Fg=:TNET18Uy8CBu+hqlQpdiqY l4bt1tNDuncPC1m4/PU7+WCYB3sw8A9bQC36OD95TaK7bEz9iw9nTbW5TsAgVHYlnUwpNEUIF J5elSBHAliR+Fo76gnJUUklTEZiUKaHQKptJgfHvnD27nYgGTE02yE5unP6r+yQ4MmFuh24Q/ 5E5W7LqRM7WS4J2UUdPnB0xSDM8JXxQj4+1Z/ZxRROcKt0Kf/BaACdtk6YC/LUAT8CxB7Ehwr xqmn6sdqdUmjpT/kH4PtGucM6+Rq0gQurul0GdT5JeLhOdnBm6lFZsPoyL9hMHcZFmBH1QgmZ QogalWKjIsF9SA6t8aAZIoWO+t6OdmLFMokN6j1gJKKHPfwBN7Wq4QbymmoJ7ApKJHyTGudlg +VEV3zk5acDJIn53dceSfxiqW0+NA1p+k8NrpgWfkPTQhuzl2c8jD2VMWz6k1042WmOOIL6P1 6WDt95YwQkIWxbnIuYV1zi9yDE44i3I/pjbohleEg2Sw4iJBrq7LColOuZ/ag9ITbHkhdz+9f luaEl67El3OvB0HJk696LYm5WMCZEOv2GQPVcbVcHTUQg2RHZri9t9Tvh8pTxJxEq1bch2iul T6rLnNp9ozteZUv/cQ5aJT5cvsmKWhAdupU12bCvFWkr8Pxze822AmCKP1Un4rL3VBomCur0x kcBff0CYsN43PBXBu7fiaBfioO2+VO2coHpOGtrLMET/OSGTDP0356FXG5FIV5oPFs/Wicw3L aawCytwmopOcYj4DJtqodvI1K+UiyPR2rRG0MsJCpXuhb3+98whoZMufgJc7bnaAXw4S60v2s Oairl4R Subject: [RFC] Deprecation of image2wbmp() From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") Hi everybody! As sequel to a former discussion[1], I have prepared a respective RFC: I'm looking forward to hear your feedback! [1] -- Christoph M. Becker