Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:101963 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 36822 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2018 04:21:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Mar 2018 04:21:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=david.proweb@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=david.proweb@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: david.proweb@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.52 mail-it0-f52.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.52] ([209.85.214.52:38611] helo=mail-it0-f52.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CD/F3-24487-56D53AA5 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 23:21:58 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f52.google.com with SMTP id j7-v6so5296297ita.3 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 20:21:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mNcRLDja+M9flKQlBZAn15ylT6bGaN0vb5R0aHs5bsI=; b=dnzFgvD4g83yrp1CooGFuYAPByn1hv6VT9IF37PX2Ftgij8RuR/UNofGX3ege3qTXj GO6ZTaoWo8+bMJxLoI2iutmnAwxLotLVR2PyKESk7N1mJwMI2r/K2yHbdAzP1QvfHNQq IzpB//SfDcDjDuhBTuv1KHF/w2lfEYCpz8Z/DaIcpRs58e+W/9zr3ch309ZVBFzjfIHY v5vYGhHrqiD+l2HXaw2Ku2JPYUfC5Imm6ZcAprgb6orCCP4TkyVwYItzHHEn/NfCwSw6 0cgBTD5/DgowwdPhFkD/0q+gvRmAQudq6jnnP17JPYbvewUgEp8XC7bgN03biBYzynfs Vzgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mNcRLDja+M9flKQlBZAn15ylT6bGaN0vb5R0aHs5bsI=; b=eqV0L6/6IN2vw8R3IyKiYASqQVULfqqCXbx1OVMC/P79I9bqlGgSBOtVaVPoH4q/oR VAZQqxOVm3Wx8WHmmvYe5ZyrJGkqFlWp/iBVlCuRZkroYo0UJdvThM+qQrhztZBY0xoX SbXtI9DTMg7X5Md4YDXIH8gicSxGumqWm1FfVTx3UKGgb9dVlwqOVwuvOIqzrzPkNLLn FXtD/V8n5JjLRMqo0kgeEZl6QSrZETI6BAaCcwAJkiPFxvD7ugUKuPiw0e+IQoSLdckT fvKNabWLiO9rOhqIg0ZTTpizYBCK6XSOkP66AA80fgl8hdHNq90dyhxKdjXSR8wpCsWo tIBA== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7G+L4eJDAcsuocL2jxkBvjXgJSAmCng2toV/Y1w28zI8IykvKZr cYmSfqMZxlp0Bx4iJC8T2YV0eJgvgOw4yT+5dTk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELv6jy17SNDPv7ByOysNAT7gX9Cl54Kxl3MTZt0d25Fdjod+QNuLBiNSka9C43n/yJh45fD/ATijqA5WH1+aG90= X-Received: by 10.36.238.139 with SMTP id b133mr390076iti.48.1520655714437; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 20:21:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.2.118.74 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 20:21:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.2.118.74 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 20:21:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 01:21:53 -0300 Message-ID: To: CHU Zhaowei Cc: Nikita Popov , PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c47c0af52d90567073ff7" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Direct method call slower than method_exists() From: david.proweb@gmail.com (David Rodrigues) --f403045c47c0af52d90567073ff7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I don't want to prove nothing, just thinking if is possible optimize empty methods to be faster than method_exists(). Em 10 de mar de 2018 1:11 AM, "CHU Zhaowei" escreveu: > What are you trying to prove? We all know method call is expensive. So > definitely it will be slower when you make more calls. > > Best regards, > CHU Zhaowei > --f403045c47c0af52d90567073ff7--