Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:101924 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 37664 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2018 17:29:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2018 17:29:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=marijic.silvio@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=marijic.silvio@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.171 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: marijic.silvio@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.171 mail-qt0-f171.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.171] ([209.85.216.171:41820] helo=mail-qt0-f171.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 57/74-19911-F72F29A5 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 12:29:35 -0500 Received: by mail-qt0-f171.google.com with SMTP id j4so1275926qth.8 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 09:29:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3KTt7htECLQDaqMISmzTtbxfzrH25kv7Q9QMpveyP9o=; b=r7+pWl19Oh+XBE1+Wdg0ROU6Sv7bleBb1U+1bB78dyNLeQelaIres71gL4JzttByig 2lEigNjB6dTkRUXSKit2Vp2dw2siFD09eGwOgvPmBLQ49O5N0gnCx0oX0JAZAHmoclfO MxPS3iZEtdkHeGXkmsBTeG2BBfuUnH3duJpwmous1isHqNSy8oWdA+cAvcJxwe1Zow/4 uWgOgJu6B9/cokPHNrzem97zXNhfsGDqnzJRWmzUuvzhgOHQkhXUhRV6ycKxS9a56wcw wG43fm41fKndAKaI2pCwmAve35rfr86/6gtbKDaS3+krvjOx+8J/x18FmgEKIDyG4gC0 zEfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3KTt7htECLQDaqMISmzTtbxfzrH25kv7Q9QMpveyP9o=; b=qNB4v6uNdpP3vb4l68PNnwbnwVriGleuE5nPeoVSXSbBf9w+Fn3VhZM7hGvPBIAAIh X6Xy0dUUpjEVo9n3fAucSVQOFXEYGzAHOjNor7mYbLlmbfKCqA5bBYVHpH6MBviA3Z5m npQcAAi60UTy/Pg+KgzgCEzgFJbGMUeuNvSkQWPJqxLkZyCkw705yIxaHU4C6zF4UsBj B9nQEVfYl908TrTiyiRjzI1ao/Vsx9We4Xgim+mlHkZQHK7p5/c3NmpH32mzwht702JP OgUgdQcRdiaXebigTpjRm9lLDAY3Qq78pEKnuaSOsFK7ibFxk/ErCJMbmgy67k50OHjY 1upg== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAqfcpBGTATRKKWPAqwq7pWDylFjrxaoSpHvgYBY5/IHQSc5MRI 0xTFcbfjkdIYITXIHMMft8lIix+aMvCY9fQb7V0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvNrAAxm+gvM/bnKGj93oYXCpyTl8cpkB5hSrYJEi2OekpwcSefYBYSQiSSrPj/QPZVBveaZ8c17t7ifw9ZZ0s= X-Received: by 10.237.61.145 with SMTP id i17mr13025707qtf.293.1519579772085; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 09:29:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.33.133 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 09:29:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.33.133 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 09:29:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 18:29:31 +0100 Message-ID: To: Dan Ackroyd Cc: PHP Internals List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141b39a85fe5105660cbc57" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV][RFC][DISCUSSION] Immutability From: marijic.silvio@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Silvio_Mariji=C4=87?=) --001a1141b39a85fe5105660cbc57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I had discussion on Twitter regarding semantics of keyword 'immutable'. I am considering now to replace keyword 'immutable' with 'value'. How would you compare those two, which one is more suitable here? On Feb 25, 2018 6:24 PM, "Silvio Mariji=C4=87" w= rote: > Hi Dan, > > So far that is still only assumption made based on the fact that most of > the code for protecting state is composed of bit checks but I am definite= ly > interested to see benchmark for this RFC. > > Best regards, > > On Feb 25, 2018 5:49 PM, "Dan Ackroyd" wrote: > > On 23 February 2018 at 13:47, Silvio Mariji=C4=87 > wrote: > > In addition to your question about impact on the performance, there is > > none. > > Have you actually measured that there is no performance impact, or is > that an assumption from what affect the code should have? > > cheers > Dan > > > --001a1141b39a85fe5105660cbc57--