Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:101922
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain basereality.com from 209.85.160.45 cause and error)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9e4235f6-82e3-aef5-4543-563a158cc6ca@vinexus.eu>
References: <1907EFF3-ED77-4F5C-85AA-CDFE323369C5@bk.ru> <CA+kxMuRXTxxsWyHumtGiyjU+pQ_KSTbtiNMd-V+U9YKPgxCNyA@mail.gmail.com>
 <880CDC06-17D6-4E40-8A48-F2E1CB405667@bk.ru> <CA+kxMuRXnUrnhqQQW9pj--UY8eSQoOrZriMUioG5Th_-8HmYqg@mail.gmail.com>
 <2A653728-97CA-4AA5-BA30-5BF26FABBC2A@bk.ru> <1501512881.14647.31.camel@schlueters.de>
 <94973CB5-A3F8-4BE4-9A78-8F759D1829E7@bk.ru> <1501515189.14647.35.camel@schlueters.de>
 <B11F0039-0508-43B3-9873-E99AA58F12F1@bk.ru> <CA+kxMuTrGdBfhRZMe=7ct3s98CHJOXvrhE1+zzc2GrAqtyOMRA@mail.gmail.com>
 <30F12FDF-4FC0-4B26-B122-EEB62C50010B@bk.ru> <9e4235f6-82e3-aef5-4543-563a158cc6ca@vinexus.eu>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 17:04:25 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+kxMuQR07sJ=f_+Ok0zVeirN8q99p66wsk_zb+KuYCrYD8bjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aljosha Papsch <aljosha.papsch@vinexus.eu>
Cc: Andrew Nester <newaltgroup@bk.ru>, =?UTF-8?Q?Johannes_Schl=C3=BCter?= <johannes@schlueters.de>, 
	"internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [Request][Discussion] Introduce interfaces PDOInterface
 and PDOStatementInterface
From: danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd)

On 15 February 2018 at 16:53, Aljosha Papsch <aljosha.papsch@vinexus.eu> wrote:
>
> Let me revive this thread.


So.......have you looked at doing the suggested next steps? Or
possibly offered to pay someone to do it?


On 6 August 2017 at 14:30, Dan Ackroyd <danack@basereality.com> wrote:
>
> The next step should be you (or anyone else) attempting to make the
> required changes to PDO to make it work, to discover what changes
> would be needed to allow using userland classes.
>
> If it isn't known what is needed to do to support it working, there is
> no point raising the RFC.


To be clear - this idea sounds like a good one.

But it needs someone to do the work, rather than more discussion about.

cheers
Dan
Ack