Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:101894
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.128.196 as permitted sender)
Sender: Michael Wallner <mike.php.net@gmail.com>
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <861e4190-1cb8-eeb6-740a-45485192034a@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <fc0f8af8-9066-d653-717d-5558f279bab6@php.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 10:21:33 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <861e4190-1cb8-eeb6-740a-45485192034a@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="8dFZT2TNVKous59qO42vfqdQoQUEymoOl"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FPM maintainership?
From: mike@php.net (Michael Wallner)

--8dFZT2TNVKous59qO42vfqdQoQUEymoOl
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="6cJ5s5yCuX75jrVYINUlH34NxzxGqJHpR";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Michael Wallner <mike@php.net>
To: internals@lists.php.net
Message-ID: <fc0f8af8-9066-d653-717d-5558f279bab6@php.net>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FPM maintainership?
References: <861e4190-1cb8-eeb6-740a-45485192034a@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <861e4190-1cb8-eeb6-740a-45485192034a@gmail.com>

--6cJ5s5yCuX75jrVYINUlH34NxzxGqJHpR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 21/02/18 01:42, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>=20
> I'd like to raise the question of FPM SAPI maintainership. Is it still
> maintained? If so, by whom? Jerome Loyet is listed as a maintainer, but=

> his last commit has been in 2012, as far as I can see, and I see no
> activity from him on the bug tracker for the last couple of years (mayb=
e
> more). FPM is a pretty important module and widely used, and we have
> over 100 bugs in the bug DB for it, not being addressed. Would anyone
> like to step up for his module? If not, what's the plan for keeping it
> alive and well?

I'd like to second that. Given the past development of heading away from
SAPIs loaded into the webserver to FastCGI being preferred, we should be
giving FPM the deserved priority. Does anyone have stats about the
popularity of our SAPIs?

I also have a patch I'd like to discuss with the new maintainers, which
attempts to fix FPM's SIGUSR2 graceful restart behaviour, and which
we've been running for half a year now IIRC.

--=20
Regards,
Mike


--6cJ5s5yCuX75jrVYINUlH34NxzxGqJHpR--

--8dFZT2TNVKous59qO42vfqdQoQUEymoOl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEHsPHHd1jWDGjN9aESA4+FLCkx8cFAlqNOh0ACgkQSA4+FLCk
x8e3GAgA1X448Li0UR7u4n5CypL+sAkJo+/hVFpUxKEvo1p3sKvmcgOTrZ4ReBbv
F9brNZb+DM1iMs+KHEx/eDqGFnGcTdp4dCd7jqNgFL5Usfn9TZIn7pnC2ebsmPlX
xZciKX3/U25N7jrC6YCTlEv7HESp1iT5W5tX5XLpfB/ceabhyiqk6DN5kz1g+Ssx
y2KEjLzJVhHKQgIW+82MYEVjKjMrCp2CK23rVt0OY3yr5b0bY+vZcKOKfJin2kVs
aNbhU87rZtBFyA4hH6cdFk9bCUXscXcGhDqDVbwYHHWx8xVfPWtchCW7HefACF64
Pv3E09MddAx4Xj4eGH+yCZIkAU0kNA==
=hjsE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--8dFZT2TNVKous59qO42vfqdQoQUEymoOl--