Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:101869
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.218.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEUnE0dKikZinHjiZmYENB57_e=kSSFfxUU+0Y9=hpH0UX0uRg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKbGgYhXjLhLZ2R107yheGh6iEWt_tnr_+NyXm=9k66MYb0MqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEUnE0dKikZinHjiZmYENB57_e=kSSFfxUU+0Y9=hpH0UX0uRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 10:43:07 -0300
Message-ID: <CAKbGgYiGk_wb++D+w=tntS9NRtVRAQrMzwXEdhcsCXrsBBo2Cw@mail.gmail.com>
To: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ce04cc304cd05652c4b57"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] About assert()
From: pslacerda@gmail.com (Pedro Lacerda)

--001a113ce04cc304cd05652c4b57
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The same beharviour, but `assert` as statement also uses 1 character less.


Em 14 de fev de 2018 10:13 AM, "Michael Morris" <tendoaki@gmail.com>
escreveu:


On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:16 AM Pedro Lacerda <pslacerda@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi developers,
>
> Trying to resolve the bug #75950 (that after long hours I found that I
> couldn't reproduce), I observed that if `zend.assertions >=3D 0` the
> generated code inside `assert()` was indeed executed even if `assert.acti=
ve
> =3D off`. Naturally the function arguments were evaluated before entering
> into the `assert()` function.
>
> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=3D75950
>
> The point is that will be possible to fully disable assertions setting
> `assert.active =3D false` after initialization if we turn `assert` into a
> statement. This can mantain fully backward compatibility. Calling
> `assert_options(ASSERT_ACTIVE, true)` or `false` after initialization wou=
ld
> fully enable or disable the functionality. It seems the most sensible thi=
ng
> to do.
>
> By the way `assert` in Java and Python is an statement, and in C it isn't=
 a
> function.
>
> So my question is what is the purpose of mantaining `assert()` a function=
,
> there are any drawbacks of fully disabling it when `zend.assertions >=3D =
0`?
>
>
> PS: Strange that nobody cared in recent emails about the proposal to a
> small increase of the testing coverage by doubling the testing time
> duration, was somewhat interesting.
>


Assert.active is the legacy PHP 5 control. Don=E2=80=99t use it.

zend.assertions -1 has the behavior you want. 0 emulates PHP 5 and
earlier=E2=80=99s broken implementation of assert. If you don=E2=80=99t hav=
e legacy
software to babysit, don=E2=80=99t use it.

>
>

--001a113ce04cc304cd05652c4b57--