Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:101866 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 49307 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2018 23:26:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Feb 2018 23:26:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=markus@fischer.name; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=markus@fischer.name; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fischer.name from 84.116.36.11 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: markus@fischer.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 84.116.36.11 vie01a-dmta-pe05-1.mx.upcmail.net Received: from [84.116.36.11] ([84.116.36.11:28929] helo=vie01a-dmta-pe05-1.mx.upcmail.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 23/3F-26725-214738A5 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 18:26:11 -0500 Received: from [172.31.216.43] (helo=vie01a-pemc-psmtp-pe01) by vie01a-dmta-pe05.mx.upcmail.net with esmtp (Exim 4.88) (envelope-from ) id 1eljxe-0000m0-Ou for internals@lists.php.net; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:26:06 +0100 Received: from mail02.home ([213.47.8.56]) by vie01a-pemc-psmtp-pe01 with SMTP @ mailcloud.upcmail.net id APRx1x00h1CY7x901PRyqg; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:25:58 +0100 X-SourceIP: 213.47.8.56 Received: from [192.168.1.220] by mail02.home with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1eljxU-0006cY-Sd for internals@lists.php.net; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:25:57 +0100 To: internals@lists.php.net References: Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:25:34 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "scanner01.home", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 2018-02-11 20:41, Wes wrote: > Hello PHPeople, I present to you... the shortest RFC ever. > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecate-backtick-operator > > Let me know what you think! > I don't have much of an opinion yet on the issue (observing the arguments in the discussion so far), but one thing which stuck out for me from one other recently announced RFCs [1] was the additional thought of automating the code change via migrations tools, etc. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: php.net] -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV][RFC][DISCUSSION] Deprecate the backtick operator From: markus@fischer.name (Markus Fischer) On 2018-02-11 20:41, Wes wrote: > Hello PHPeople, I present to you... the shortest RFC ever. > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecate-backtick-operator > > Let me know what you think! > I don't have much of an opinion yet on the issue (observing the arguments in the discussion so far), but one thing which stuck out for me from one other recently announced RFCs [1] was the additional thought of automating the code change via migrations tools, etc. No one likes to do things manually and getting support for code fixers could be of help here. cheers, - Markus [1] https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fallback-to-root-scope-deprecation