Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:101796
Return-Path: <narf@devilix.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 78594 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2018 02:51:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 7 Feb 2018 02:51:07 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=narf@devilix.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=narf@devilix.net; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain devilix.net designates 209.85.128.172 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: narf@devilix.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.128.172 mail-wr0-f172.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.128.172] ([209.85.128.172:43368] helo=mail-wr0-f172.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 09/8A-49805-A996A7A5 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 21:51:07 -0500
Received: by mail-wr0-f172.google.com with SMTP id b52so4053050wrd.10
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 18:51:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=devilix.net; s=google;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=RccmW40hmhkXEzDHZ676TXtA6JU3WiBlIrXLieKMSSA=;
        b=Vs4POeL/qN7dJtBrcXMqNf632yVKuAhn41zUNP78IMnCfW0h2qoe4cYsGdgBqVLZbz
         k9FqkPC3Rj6GGf17di/h7ck8aO5BIm85LM2PS57p9fM7KJsnCIu5NOy6DmLard/yUC4R
         oz8AjDZsZw0768elVaGLBOhesZH6kGDzzfl0Y=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=RccmW40hmhkXEzDHZ676TXtA6JU3WiBlIrXLieKMSSA=;
        b=ii60EZvrvKW3VtNotF6eeAUPNEgAT6zl/km/Oy+x9BqYmj1sjq6c9zZCwFs29yJWha
         CzxijHl8WRxopyjaZX22pIY40LphJhB6964Zr/5e0/ZBnef8thzhR7rqY7xJ7ac7M6LQ
         bBnG8KWBcChRGYMKHNAM7Jcp76BI4X5HSzqkuzSm1UIjBvatUlMSG7iLvOm/3iN6nDuf
         rtnZC6T26UbCs3dUV5Qiu26p97D3lmWTaxNg78RA/FOpFDEuLMAlAtPx0DcjBgK/6Qzn
         NHVg7Y6rJ2TT/UAWTa9GqOM9uQgA8dx7ESi+jchqPhrCIqw1Y9oJxNsKj86cfqSL4CVI
         BQsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAbc39DnXZ1jWEZrchA5HhKfwkQddB/J7qoGU2O2QbOvlTjRTCk
	DNYD/ftVBhz+c+9Mr7OhfXkVO6eZj/Ak1+fJlEF8xw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x22645UeE4O8GOunzkRSeaqz4vGOCnu0YSmLPm0lXzZqxi4B19CT8zscFylQXnHbRkR0d8/AXXVRcghLZS0zk3qc=
X-Received: by 10.223.167.3 with SMTP id c3mr4081417wrd.197.1517971864145;
 Tue, 06 Feb 2018 18:51:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.138.230 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 18:51:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <df2433bd-bbc4-8669-c92f-d59069bea5d3@gmail.com>
References: <CAOv67gvh_TM8B+ZvJeMwQDN7wnC+n7JiW78Ydk+V3wRjsXigBA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEPJdunk-uWhaqOtUP24qNzqv-EBvJnJncikPsfLBtjPkfwH8g@mail.gmail.com>
 <07d9e3a0-d516-aa77-4818-ce8b02e8dd08@gmail.com> <CAEPJdu=SBAJiPf-jP27ViQJ=Rk4fk5m841L8=LhBa9HtScdSPA@mail.gmail.com>
 <df2433bd-bbc4-8669-c92f-d59069bea5d3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 04:51:03 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPhkiZxfMYnjaJM8FO+pZy9h16GfdjMFfd+6gt+QgDvUVN07Fg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin Eberlei <kontakt@beberlei.de>, Wes <netmo.php@gmail.com>, 
	PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][DISCUSSION] Deprecation of fallback to root scope
From: narf@devilix.net (Andrey Andreev)

Hi,

> Realistically, how often do you override strlen? If I say "never", I
> probably would be close enough for all practical purposes.

It's an ironic coincidence that you use strlen() as an example.
Because it and substr() are possibly the most likely to be overriden,
where we need code to be byte-safe in spite of mbstring.func_overload.

But why does that matter, either way?

Cheers,
Andrey.