Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:101515 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 53431 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2018 17:28:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Jan 2018 17:28:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=chasepeeler@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=chasepeeler@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: chasepeeler@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.54 mail-wm0-f54.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.54] ([74.125.82.54:35015] helo=mail-wm0-f54.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EC/C1-23177-1D21D4A5 for ; Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:28:49 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id a79so3923897wma.0 for ; Wed, 03 Jan 2018 09:28:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lDmfJoGRdqQYJSBNCdoZctzp+fGlm1qTJ76ubjrdXZk=; b=Shq1lKdDv0LhXCoVtjNuu2OxbdR/EZ5ylOnKSyk9dZGnX3mIDZle4p7EmLZUa2W4s2 do4V6qmXF9ygAlbVLlKbOXjYx1o2TfREq2fKjsXI1ofgJ403zbQesSOPp/ZIHiF5pn/8 QcAB2X/9NhG/7hv4Qqhy3tf1dTe7stvJ7RUFHISzpQrKW5tY4A17B5/QfMv9/oKJ+J++ S3H6kG5876INFoU5S81hgegPyzczbWuggbvrgjCrb2nG/DF6ptWdFuPTNzAvZRA0YWEx 6y78VWrHwsN/9F85hjDPU359JW0frUb1x9Au/OOfkiTBrnwj1RmpcIFPZsRyDN1Z2qwk r8Lw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lDmfJoGRdqQYJSBNCdoZctzp+fGlm1qTJ76ubjrdXZk=; b=gomdljho1LmbBA7zmXg5v+Q4mjYBv4UPJdJoKMye92lwQubItfMhmuIsgp0E8QEN8J eSnRVrfVhH9aWgsZh03xqviJJpEal8OCOHQM+7DXC5PPzX4N1lV+tAx/bYQx4XWwEzBA LWgTWhHcUglrQ2m8OMPgWxY/VlTjkroYX+rjLSCWE+hu4PJXEPNomQNd+W3w3EpgOGnp 8A7lHvAKNLovwYXI6J2x4td13PH31lzcg2CIchPI3n37Dbr0dF5Qow93OjHOskgAxC9T annXtYAiVLJKpLX5Rm4bNOeBwLvl7zNH/IXYuF2dvHtpPopU401HFaM+Ln9A1d8IlLAG DVRg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJEtpbwbl9fxl/3cz30VsVqaFAG23VvNEgLN2QSKH+X9KPPRGdR HpHiYTSYhDECZj3FVT/qPJzpu4Raj0df9Sb5z9IRxg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosy1OH3B2Q/Dp4lLvq+TdU+OZ9Z6ouT1pS163LgqoAacQKrbJbhbPgH4CtyB8okTm+OeHH33ncvOYKlgVE+/4s= X-Received: by 10.28.213.2 with SMTP id m2mr1798670wmg.141.1515000527018; Wed, 03 Jan 2018 09:28:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:28:36 +0000 Message-ID: To: Michael Morris Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114681423f62e40561e28cdc" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Mailing list moderation From: chasepeeler@gmail.com (Chase Peeler) --001a114681423f62e40561e28cdc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 12:18 PM Michael Morris wrote: > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Chase Peeler > wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 10:49 AM Paul Jones wrote: > > > > On Jan 2, 2018, at 12:29, Dustin Wheeler wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 12:19 PM, Levi Morrison > wrote: > > > > > > If someone dislikes Tony's commentary for any reason (or no reason!) > they > > > are free to filter his messages themselves -- and then unfilter his > > > messages when they see fit. > > > > > > > I agree with Paul. It would be different if email clients that allowed > > filtering were expensive or hard to find. They aren=E2=80=99t, though. = Pretty > much > > every email client not only allows filtering, but rather advanced > filtering > > as well. > > > > All fine and well, but it doesn't work when people start quoting the > offender. Also, filters don't stop the poison from affecting the mood of > the posters who interact with him. > > In my experience loud and obnoxious voices drive off thoughtful and > introspective ones every time. That is the consequence of giving a platfo= rm > to them. As the saying goes, It's pointless to wrestle a pig - you'll jus= t > get muddy and the pig enjoys it. From a moderators standpoint, if you > refuse to block jerks eventually all you'll be left with are jerks. > > I think self moderation still solves this. If the person is disruptive enough, eventually enough people will block them and there won't be many instances of them getting quoted or poisoning the thread. If certain people decide to engage them, then others will start to block them as well. In the end, they'll have to choose whether they want to contribute in a positive way to the list, or, "wrestle with pigs." The two options will be mutually exclusive, since you can't continue to pull content others are trying to ignore back into the conversation without getting ignored yourself. > > > > Instead of suspending users, no matter how egregious their offenses may > be, > > let individual users filter them out as they see fit. > > > > > Again, in my experience people usually elect to simply leave altogether > rather than set a long block list. And frankly Tony isn't worth even one > contributing coder. > > Tony has been asked multiple times by multiple people to behave. He's be= en > banned from other PHP related forums I know of. He's not here to contribu= te > in any meaningful way, only complain and make passive agressive swipes at > other users. I could go on, but I think that alone makes the case that he > needs to be gone. > Maybe, maybe not. Either way, I don't want you making that decision for me. I should be allowed to determine at which point someone's negative contributions outweigh their positive ones to a point that I no longer feel they are productive. --=20 -- Chase chasepeeler@gmail.com --001a114681423f62e40561e28cdc--