Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:101482 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52719 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2018 11:09:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Jan 2018 11:09:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=sebastian@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=sebastian@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 188.94.27.5 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: sebastian@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 188.94.27.5 scarlet.netpirates.net Received: from [188.94.27.5] ([188.94.27.5:38858] helo=scarlet.netpirates.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 7B/44-23177-2586B4A5 for ; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 06:09:08 -0500 Received: (qmail 25122 invoked by uid 89); 2 Jan 2018 11:09:04 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 25114, pid: 25117, t: 0.1796s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.99.1/m:/d:20700 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.178.41?) (php@sebastian-bergmann.de@93.226.193.25) by scarlet.netpirates.net with ESMTPA; 2 Jan 2018 11:09:04 -0000 To: internals@lists.php.net References: Reply-To: internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 12:09:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Mailing list moderation From: sebastian@php.net (Sebastian Bergmann) Am 02.01.2018 um 11:49 schrieb Nikita Popov: > I would like to request a mailing list suspension for the users > tonymarston@hotmail.com and lists@rhsoft.net, who have recently been > aggressively derailing the "Scalar Pseudo-type" thread, despite requests to > moderate their participation both in that thread, and on a number of > previous instances -- this is certainly not the first time these two users > have converted an RFC discussion into a dick measuring contest. +1