Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:101458 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 94371 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2017 17:23:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Dec 2017 17:23:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lists@rhsoft.net; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lists@rhsoft.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain rhsoft.net designates 91.118.73.15 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lists@rhsoft.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 91.118.73.15 mail.thelounge.net Received: from [91.118.73.15] ([91.118.73.15:39853] helo=mail.thelounge.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 68/71-47595-88BC74A5 for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 12:23:21 -0500 Received: from srv-rhsoft.rhsoft.net (Authenticated sender: h.reindl@thelounge.net) by mail.thelounge.net (THELOUNGE MTA) with ESMTPSA id 3z89K05xS0zXMR for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2017 18:23:16 +0100 (CET) To: internals@lists.php.net References: <72392123-d37b-26df-6886-218f48205f8a@fleshgrinder.com> <58A5ABDF-AA25-46D4-83E7-4DE72E3DFF5E@gmail.com> <757270790.33iDQ9MZ2V@vulcan> <52ca4e64-bb44-ba1d-4ba7-b0706915d709@rhsoft.net> <518335b8-d2f7-5b25-e85a-eff610abc299@rhsoft.net> Message-ID: <46f44c98-5e1d-7a6b-ed25-8d25db7c3e3b@rhsoft.net> Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 18:23:16 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: de-CH Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [DISCUSSION] Scalar Pseudo-type From: lists@rhsoft.net ("lists@rhsoft.net") Am 30.12.2017 um 18:15 schrieb Sebastian Bergmann: > Am 29.12.2017 um 18:30 schrieb lists@rhsoft.net: >> "i don't see a benefit, i don't like it" are no valid reasons to do so > > I strongly disagree. If a majority of people do not see the benefit of a > syntax change then the syntax should not be changed. A change to the > syntax of PHP has a ripple effect throughout the library and tools > ecosystem of PHP. This is a cost. This cost needs to be justified by a > benefit. which costs do a new feature without BC break have for the ecosystem?