Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:101450 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38895 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2017 18:35:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Dec 2017 18:35:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php-lists@koalephant.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php-lists@koalephant.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain koalephant.com designates 206.123.115.54 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php-lists@koalephant.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 206.123.115.54 mail1.25mail.st Received: from [206.123.115.54] ([206.123.115.54:50162] helo=mail1.25mail.st) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5E/FD-47595-ADA864A5 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 13:35:08 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.27] (unknown [49.48.243.158]) by mail1.25mail.st (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C5FE604BF; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 18:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15C153) In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 01:34:50 +0700 Cc: "lists@rhsoft.net" , php@fleshgrinder.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <72392123-d37b-26df-6886-218f48205f8a@fleshgrinder.com> <58A5ABDF-AA25-46D4-83E7-4DE72E3DFF5E@gmail.com> <757270790.33iDQ9MZ2V@vulcan> <52ca4e64-bb44-ba1d-4ba7-b0706915d709@rhsoft.net> To: internals@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [DISCUSSION] Scalar Pseudo-type From: php-lists@koalephant.com (Stephen Reay) > On 30 Dec 2017, at 00:24, Fleshgrinder wrote: >=20 > Again, obviously, the question remains, why would you care? Really, that's what's obvious to you? What's obvious to *me* is that if a method accepts two different types of pa= rameters, you'd want to know which was passed in.=