Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:10128 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98241 invoked by uid 1010); 27 May 2004 23:46:32 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98217 invoked from network); 27 May 2004 23:46:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mrout3.yahoo.com) (216.145.54.173) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 27 May 2004 23:46:32 -0000 Received: from bourbon.corp.yahoo.com (bourbon.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.53.135]) by mrout3.yahoo.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/y.out) with ESMTP id i4RNkB78058007; Thu, 27 May 2004 16:46:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from andrei@localhost) by bourbon.corp.yahoo.com (8.12.9/8.11.1) id i4RNkBxq039162; Thu, 27 May 2004 16:46:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andrei@gravitonic.com) X-Authentication-Warning: bourbon.corp.yahoo.com: andrei set sender to andrei@gravitonic.com using -f Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 16:46:11 -0700 To: Sara Golemon Cc: internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: <20040527234611.GA39141@gravitonic.com> References: <20040527155047.GA36904@gravitonic.com> <20040527184929.GB23166@csh.rit.edu> <20040527190601.45769.qmail@pb1.pair.com> <20040527200440.GA38203@gravitonic.com> <20040527213949.29052.qmail@pb1.pair.com> <20040527225223.GA38890@gravitonic.com> <20040527230203.72676.qmail@pb1.pair.com> <20040527233805.73401.qmail@pb1.pair.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040527233805.73401.qmail@pb1.pair.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [patch] re-invoking default error handler From: andrei@gravitonic.com (Andrei Zmievski) On Thu, 27 May 2004, Sara Golemon wrote: > Nah, I know. I'm not saying I'm against it, all I'm saying is that noone > will hear any objections from me. It puts an extra tool in the hands of the > user at negligible cost and that's a good thing. All I meant by my comment > was that it's a tool I don't ever see myself (personally) using. So.. are we agreed that it won't do harm to PHP 5 at this point? - Andrei