Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:101013 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4792 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2017 10:00:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Nov 2017 10:00:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:38046] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 94/79-07742-05B99F95 for ; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 05:00:49 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13A1810C852; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 10:00:46 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 10:00:44 +0000 (GMT) X-X-Sender: derick@singlemalt.home.derickrethans.nl To: Rowan Collins cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="8323329-525411433-1509530423=:3373" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Implement missing SQLite feature "openBlob" in PDO From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) --8323329-525411433-1509530423=:3373 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Rowan Collins wrote: > On 30/10/2017 03:14, Dan Ackroyd wrote: > > The vote for this should have ended......3 days ago. > >=20 > > At which point I believe the vote was actually passing. >=20 >=20 > Hm, that's awkward! >=20 > For the record: >=20 > - voting was announced on the evening of the 9th "for two weeks" which wo= uld > imply the evening of the 23rd > - however, the e-mail also said "Vote will end on Wednesday the 25th of > October. " > - the wiki page states "Vote closing on Oct 27, 2017." > - https://php-rfc-watch.beberlei.de/ lists "daverandom" voting No at > 2017-10-28T07:28:00+0000 (*mutters something about relative date display = being > uselessly vague*) >=20 > It's possible that daverandom was several hours west of Greenwich at the = time > (e.g. in North America), where it was still late on October 27th. So taki= ng > the latest of the three published closing dates, and applying the most > generous time zone, it's possible that all the votes were valid. >=20 > It's certainly clear that no *new* votes should be counted. >=20 > The last vote before that according to the rfc-watch tool was "salathe" o= n the > 21st, so if daverandom's vote is *not* valid, the RFC passes 7:6; however= , if > daverandom's vote *is* valid, we have 7:7, and the RFC is declined. 7:6 is technically not "50%"+1. 50% of 13 is 6=C2=BD, and 7 is not higher= =20 than 6=C2=BD + 1. :-) cheers, Derick --=20 https://derickrethans.nl | https://xdebug.org | https://dram.io Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: https://xdebug.org/donate.php twitter: @derickr and @xdebug --8323329-525411433-1509530423=:3373--