Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:100998 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89873 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2017 20:11:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Oct 2017 20:11:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rowan.collins@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rowan.collins@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.128.171 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rowan.collins@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.128.171 mail-wr0-f171.google.com Received: from [209.85.128.171] ([209.85.128.171:55476] helo=mail-wr0-f171.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 4C/5D-07742-B6787F95 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 15:11:23 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f171.google.com with SMTP id l8so13859588wre.12 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 13:11:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=JsXDtX6OetRHNB9KHfNc56EL4ioN3un/87IpP1urLoc=; b=XvsaJLwOQ2iF1kQOnlONqH1iD/QJcDbwGIJsj5nm8GH9HPRcvJWGrCzIHwkM7p0A/b hF+ejIwtOSydLWAt4c8gxNAx1PrvjB2qAiYoIknGcRkx9Q7L+kSPUqcC65sS2SdeKdpr kfYT65p6OAGLQnjEr674Qcap+t+1f0qPdOj53u+TD9gRdok9xmg4qQYLZLncuHF3mLwB JbDVlXGOwmryBJSMO6B+IJdly/jvN+xXSE18S+8ytbdLUl6Z4y9gpcZM3HSwYEa3zAXc 6XM9A0/M/NCNHfcWeTRL4OlaoEz5xUBP7LiJdYA1/dHSKUqc+XbISwA8YQCnOAkVVGoI +9lw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=JsXDtX6OetRHNB9KHfNc56EL4ioN3un/87IpP1urLoc=; b=VdhPhqOnigGXRWHEaQ9P+NSvzCceTSwcEZHMb6MBNRj1yf32WYekwPmSQTRBexJKpA ud2ke9+ZDhIBOCcRWqw1zhtHK98WMYcnegkp2H8+OQfYJPUrT8puewlbjWcfk8JwKaJY n5E0UYdKD6lOd0EMecvdS+Y/ydRfAW604RMhnLoLGFoU7X9laq68HMIHcBKFZbuOG9eb r2ckB/2tE1oMg27xJx4GaUpUEK59USwFMSrlmCWaYHNij6DJqmNwo9G3/FBcIXE7flh4 XwsmBXKTKP0poT7ORI47X2V4Yk8GbIbl7R4gssytWBy07nnxsMPq4YS4D28+V37qH9pD Ie4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXnr/1gzM/qnWnKmzZxNZwEb7N5xgT2ztX4qpia4vSgH0HD7a23 /5tE+8dF90ug3mpuBXTLDO70rA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QGOGigU8WMO5+rGxkghpb5wftTUUomM/WfMnaJiPaWsMwagnw/BcpEM11o1WpVb4kNpmIUlg== X-Received: by 10.223.172.3 with SMTP id v3mr9145172wrc.195.1509394280265; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 13:11:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a00:23c4:4b81:ae00:205a:64a6:722a:18ad? ([2a00:23c4:4b81:ae00:205a:64a6:722a:18ad]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p128sm46158wmb.1.2017.10.30.13.11.18 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 13:11:19 -0700 (PDT) To: internals@lists.php.net References: Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 20:11:18 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Implement missing SQLite feature "openBlob" in PDO From: rowan.collins@gmail.com (Rowan Collins) On 30/10/2017 03:14, Dan Ackroyd wrote: > The vote for this should have ended......3 days ago. > > At which point I believe the vote was actually passing. Hm, that's awkward! For the record: - voting was announced on the evening of the 9th "for two weeks" which would imply the evening of the 23rd - however, the e-mail also said "Vote will end on Wednesday the 25th of October. " - the wiki page states "Vote closing on Oct 27, 2017." - https://php-rfc-watch.beberlei.de/ lists "daverandom" voting No at 2017-10-28T07:28:00+0000 (*mutters something about relative date display being uselessly vague*) It's possible that daverandom was several hours west of Greenwich at the time (e.g. in North America), where it was still late on October 27th. So taking the latest of the three published closing dates, and applying the most generous time zone, it's possible that all the votes were valid. It's certainly clear that no *new* votes should be counted. The last vote before that according to the rfc-watch tool was "salathe" on the 21st, so if daverandom's vote is *not* valid, the RFC passes 7:6; however, if daverandom's vote *is* valid, we have 7:7, and the RFC is declined. In my opinion, the very fact that it was this close suggests that there is not consensus in favour of the change, and therefore it would be reasonable to err on the side of caution, and not adopt the change. Regards, -- Rowan Collins [IMSoP]