Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:100884
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.45 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A27F7E3A-367F-4373-9C6B-F8A83B02E19E@me.com>
References: <CA+aNemZ-_L-fMdWMFf2jEo55sKWEM8C_87_hQh=LbjHBhw7Kww@mail.gmail.com>
 <A27F7E3A-367F-4373-9C6B-F8A83B02E19E@me.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 20:28:03 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+aNembPjh6Es04z3h=_5gA4gE+YkfZjcGzBGWB51Usx28RYQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_D=C3=B6hler?= <michaeldoehler@me.com>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114430787440bc055b5db38d"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Suggestion Method Constant
From: mathiasgrimm@gmail.com (Mathias Grimm)

--001a114430787440bc055b5db38d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The only problem with the @ symbol is the lack of consistency with the
other constants class constants are also MyClass::MY_CONST, or
MyClass::class, so I think it makes sense to also be
MyClass::myMethod::method

On 12 October 2017 at 20:24, Michael D=C3=B6hler <michaeldoehler@me.com> wr=
ote:

> Hi,
>
> Same i have in mind, for example: MyClass@myMethod
>
> To make also some method call routing easier, e.g. in userland routers.
>
> Transform the current approach:
>
> $app->get("/foo", [MyClass::class, "myMethod"]);
>
> To:
>
> $app->get("/foo", MyClass@myMethod);
>
> This will ease a lot, e.g. for refactoring, IDE usage and completes the
> code as configuration approach for PHP.
>
> Thanks
> Michael
>
> > Am 12.10.2017 um 19:43 schrieb Mathias Grimm <mathiasgrimm@gmail.com>:
> >
> > I would like to suggest a method constant that could be used the same w=
ay
> > we use the ::class one
> >
> > I don't have a strong personal preference but it could be something lik=
e:
> >
> > MyController::myActionMethod::method, no sure about the internals but i=
t
> > would be consistent with the one for the class.
> >
> > Cheers,
>

--001a114430787440bc055b5db38d--