Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:100865 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 23227 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2017 23:11:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Oct 2017 23:11:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@bohwaz.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@bohwaz.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain bohwaz.net designates 5.135.163.151 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@bohwaz.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 5.135.163.151 sanguine.kd2.org Received: from [5.135.163.151] ([5.135.163.151:43964] helo=mail.kd2.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CC/B0-49033-C15AED95 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 19:11:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bohwaz.net; s=mail; h=Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:From:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:To; bh=c89UkzmkE7JPV8kT8l79KcT8HzZby9xMGRykzzHLskY=; b=SWJ2zK33Wej3G+3esk9f88zulbRidXLbiQsuNMwWNi6HbYgSQ2G9k8ONkXSskwZsvNXwaNFrZZsWpNpJ4He+bWV3rOCEZ6dM573R0fYlxMuT7aEWVuLeETSKeJXPBlhKCjd336QRrGk4zekSJm4r5XjYd4XkprMIqYQnlHL2CmU=; Received: from narragoon by mail.kd2.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e2Q9p-0005KD-7E; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 01:11:21 +0200 To: Dan Ackroyd X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:11:21 +1300 Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: References: <050ebe9b36b83431a4f2d5c170de57ad@bohwaz.net> Message-ID: <1aecde71827b7e65422dd6243e74a67b@bohwaz.net> X-Sender: php@bohwaz.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.5 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Implement missing SQLite feature "openBlob" in PDO From: php@bohwaz.net (BohwaZ/PHP) Le 12/10/2017 12:00, Dan Ackroyd a écrit : > On 11 October 2017 at 22:03, BohwaZ/PHP wrote: >> Hey, >> >> For people voting against the RFC, could you please explain your vote >> here >> so that we might understand? >> >> Cheers. > > I think people were reasonably clear during the discussion. > > Having certain methods only available on an object depending on how it > was initialized is just not a good idea. As far as I know, no one volunteered to rewrite PDO to change that? I don't really understand that logic. Yeah the existing behaviour is not optimal. But there is no other solution right now. Should we also stop adding any feature to PHP because most PHP functions are named incoherently and we need to wait until all of them are renamed correctly? Hopefully not :) It might be years (or never) before that PDO behaviour is changed. In the meantime PHP will just be missing features that could have been provided, this sounds strange to me.