Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:100855 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28663 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2017 15:10:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Oct 2017 15:10:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lists@rhsoft.net; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lists@rhsoft.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain rhsoft.net designates 91.118.73.15 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lists@rhsoft.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 91.118.73.15 mail.thelounge.net Received: from [91.118.73.15] ([91.118.73.15:24941] helo=mail.thelounge.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 8F/C8-49033-ED2ECD95 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:10:23 -0400 Received: from srv-rhsoft.rhsoft.net (Authenticated sender: h.reindl@thelounge.net) by mail.thelounge.net (THELOUNGE MTA) with ESMTPSA id 3yBLBv5YjNzXMR for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 17:10:15 +0200 (CEST) To: internals@lists.php.net References: <9a3f15dd-5dfc-144b-cc5f-66f689c33f53@php.net> Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 17:10:15 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: de-CH Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Strict type declarations not enforced for Reflection API invocation From: lists@rhsoft.net ("lists@rhsoft.net") Am 10.10.2017 um 16:57 schrieb Christoph M. Becker: > On 10.10.2017 at 15:41, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > >> I consider this a serious bug that leads to unexpected, confusing problems >> such as >> https://github.com/sebastianbergmann/phpunit/issues/2796#issuecomment-335180273. >> >> I understand Nikita's point of view (see >> https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/2837#issuecomment-335405067) that >> changing this behavior (aka. fixing this bug) can be considered a >> "non-trivial backwards compatibility break". Therefore I would like to >> bring this issue to the attention of this list with this mail. > > This is most certainly not an *implementation* bug. The RFC which > introduced strict typing[1] states: > > | By default, all PHP files are in weak type-checking mode. yes but the file in question has strict-types enabled declare(strict_types=1); > And later: > > | This proposal takes the standpoint that it's up to the caller to > | decide how functions should be called. > | […] > | Therefore, this proposal does not allow internal developers to > | “opt-in” to strict typing. yes but the file in question has strict-types enabled declare(strict_types=1); > In case of bug #75345 the caller is a method of ReflectionFunction, > which is defined in weak type-checking mode. yes but the file in question has strict-types enabled declare(strict_types=1); > One may argue that this is a *design* bug, but after nearly two years of > PHP 7 there may be a lots of code relying on the current behavior, so in > my opinion changing the behavior could not really be regarded as fixing > a bug. > > [1] yes but the file in question has strict-types enabled declare(strict_types=1); that decalare line was the explicit wish of the person who wrote the php file