Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:100573 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38890 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2017 22:23:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Sep 2017 22:23:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.17.20 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.17.20 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.17.20] ([212.227.17.20:51450] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 47/57-19300-1DFA9B95 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 18:23:13 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.106] ([79.243.117.113]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MQih7-1dzhdU1c7h-00TyN1; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:23:05 +0200 To: Zeev Suraski Cc: Sara Golemon , PHP internals References: <9f1b9af5-291f-66c6-b895-ff2deb22971c@gmx.de> <1ffc03a2-77b8-d989-77a4-d90122e6fbca@gmx.de> <984DB97E-BCB8-44B1-A4AA-181D8BAD1434@zend.com> Message-ID: <619122b7-fdeb-070b-9f1a-46a1b01572a2@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:23:07 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <984DB97E-BCB8-44B1-A4AA-181D8BAD1434@zend.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:w/OZWd4OF3DfG61BOAJnrn+28cZFnSYdZbxLfLjzn4fhKqkhIrS W+3oOZDRWtYeKsW6O4hrX5i87yzdefl+99iS3DivHabbBkEXAr3EsHlSNVKkijTvezsbv+o NOZ7A/yg68dvoZhnfelz3Z5XkZaclaPH+VOJ932XovXXz4ewlEroA3mymX5os0VVQ8ZiZvW V30scqpNgSZpCG7fLn4YQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:0rzZ1vEOSoU=:63EHqd2DnTSGTHUKvKodey zbHj64mrB4PJ8S7SuEMiZsCRtd7qJreC2k66qf6WLP/0gHclsKJkIc718k/aC66ITnwfQ0hdW PspC3xiP41+RxOWE7vHF5qI3sBOFHjVDy7xSKDwvdPLSLBOggqzPZ3Jp8fLlTgKkwhJH6qaXP 4lr6HaUdcMI0xRgTTF1OBzzVK4Zo/hw0IMr+fk87siDQNo59pQGCXlrnj3+rSa3sOPG2YgJgb /thSYK7ENlHAo2HBh6/YgQ06f+muB1qmzE6k957detN7uxt4Yq0c0uHuUQVOv4g/LKtvoBhKJ KZ+4ay6tar2OlJGFIFeAvjtyDRKOMO9JXLtDKbOliZ28wCBajQV6fm/ytkC0LXwXyNQYu4Qfb bwhuQFtG7k9DVSB4QxD/HAuw1V4sT+C5adeLX9Tp1ijpLyszrIBDvCaDl9zgWhmaZdoWww9C2 MfYrvueyiNGYocQx8wtP0PwAOVmN4exVP0YyLO82O21x2lZzH5b1N4zw0x+EMNd1K3bNpobz+ AuqBEfUb4uCiFzb55lOrCdCN9i1Ta3o/I5UCLOzb+ds5OdLHljc14UXCGSPsVp1Mes2ReZ33y t9gQc6ZiIj+6Bdl1QAiux5ht8zkoWDcePVuyvgh72S8V3vcvt153I9AfkO3P0A2YrhI6nrArI 6UPJgnEt39MVmEpEI2x7Rwm9bMmqeAg6hYa+ibwkLiKUBwUnTLWXF5WLYID45GtRO01j+XK5y 0I+q3spCzTMJOztSGBQz5LEWuY7h1ziWdphhZEYdH1utQWEaSLL4IjTnVnQrqB8g4MXrFjxAV djKYPd5Ilm0MnFy1VJ9k1RI1kLULMJVzXL70XmielCoPPyjhaY= Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][Discuss] Increase non-syntaxruntime-impactingRFC votingthreshold to 60% From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") On 14.09.2017 at 00:08m, Zeev Suraski wrote: > On 14 Sep 2017, at 1:03, Christoph M. Becker > wrote: > > On 13.09.2017 at 23:38, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > From: Christoph M. Becker [mailto:cmbecker69@gmx.de] > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 12:25 AM > To: Sara Golemon >; PHP internals > > Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC][Discuss] Increase non-syntax runtime-impacting > RFC votingthreshold to 60% > > FTR: Zeev has also started preparing an RFC which includes this voting > threshold, besides further issues: . > > Oh wow, I was hoping to bake it for a while longer before public scrutiny :) > > If you want to hide changes from , you > have to mark them as "Minor Changes" (right below the "Edit summary"). > > I'm not into hiding, it's not confidential, just wasn't quite ready for the spotlight just yet, especially as I won't be around to discuss it for over a month :) I didn't want to bring it into the spotlight – I just wanted to avoid having two partially overlapping RFCs going unnoticed by the respective authors. That's also why I've snipped most parts of your previous reply, even though I'd have to say something about it. :) -- Christoph M. Becker