Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:100528
Return-Path: <lists@rhsoft.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 41881 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2017 21:54:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 11 Sep 2017 21:54:49 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lists@rhsoft.net; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lists@rhsoft.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain rhsoft.net designates 91.118.73.15 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lists@rhsoft.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 91.118.73.15 mail.thelounge.net  
Received: from [91.118.73.15] ([91.118.73.15:19001] helo=mail.thelounge.net)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id D7/EB-10715-82607B95 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:54:49 -0400
Received: from srv-rhsoft.rhsoft.net  (Authenticated sender: h.reindl@thelounge.net) by mail.thelounge.net (THELOUNGE MTA) with ESMTPSA id 3xrhY00Ln8zXMT
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 23:54:44 +0200 (CEST)
To: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <CAGa2bXafM0QgMdCuUfEnNcejHAi208=4tCqbi1APT20Z_jcvuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <E83D7E80-5DC8-49AC-9FA6-D6C1A42ADAE7@gmail.com>
 <0db9cfa3-2b31-ee41-713c-889b7cc06406@lsces.co.uk>
 <E9DCBF61-8B3D-41C3-9D09-61C6CC8810F3@gmail.com>
 <CA+kxMuSuB7xcMYXcsVj4NDZKwBZWq3sbt2h6s9J4QxzOcfCTHg@mail.gmail.com>
 <B234C70B-2012-443B-967D-C819D65C9C5B@gmail.com>
 <CA+kxMuSL1kEW60S7DFJb06+r2Q3rC1ueeWU1jAP78FY65aJoDg@mail.gmail.com>
 <3C.DD.10715.4E501B95@pb1.pair.com>
 <CAGa2bXa4UvkL-ZsLAB2bF05L4q_oduixSzVvYzu9nddkSVttXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <93.85.10715.AB3B3B95@pb1.pair.com>
 <CAGa2bXYbBPwMmVegBajb4808yBasE6u9s_i99KFzqabixVy2mw@mail.gmail.com>
 <049578E9-4C9A-42D8-B206-8ABAF070E151@koalephant.com>
 <CAGa2bXYUV3_x+9CLR8XYW1Qn569XQQ3OoAViZZ2So-r0+XOJhw@mail.gmail.com>
 <05A8DB1C-4683-4934-A7DA-C7CD71E6CCB6@koalephant.com>
 <CAGa2bXa-UBSwiC-XqDievTPCQ9jHiy=TtPH=_d1qKPBYgXEMQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <3f900f87-ca88-a7e1-4c11-6263455f2039@rhsoft.net>
 <CAGa2bXaVb_TAvGbX4_VHA29by9OjmBjNoQYq=XOXS8b2MvZN7w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <04c8d1d5-7f78-9f35-b554-10939ed2fa2a@rhsoft.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 23:54:43 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGa2bXaVb_TAvGbX4_VHA29by9OjmBjNoQYq=XOXS8b2MvZN7w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: de-CH
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] A validator module for PHP7
From: lists@rhsoft.net ("lists@rhsoft.net")



Am 11.09.2017 um 23:39 schrieb Yasuo Ohgaki:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:35 AM, lists@rhsoft.net 
>     but you still fail to explain why in the world you don#t try to
>     enhance the existing filter functions instead invent a new beast
>     leading finally to have the existin filter functions and your new
>     stuff which share the same intention
> 
> 
> Why don't you read previous RFC and the vote result?
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/add_validate_functions_to_filter

and why do you not take the contra arguments against how do you think 
things should be done into your considerations and believe bikeshed it 
with a different name will achieve anything?

it's basially the same as your hash_hkdf() related stuff - you just 
ignore everybody and cntinue to ride a dead horse up to a level where 
even pure readers of the internals list just have enough and only think 
"stop it guy"