Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:100527
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ohgaki.net designates 180.42.98.130 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGa2bXaVb_TAvGbX4_VHA29by9OjmBjNoQYq=XOXS8b2MvZN7w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGa2bXafM0QgMdCuUfEnNcejHAi208=4tCqbi1APT20Z_jcvuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXYch8UJ70No=UvqtQ79pKbJ1MRtHN0QLk8kCSV+yhMNbg@mail.gmail.com>
 <f8959d0a-429f-4efc-8682-572680a075fa@lsces.co.uk> <E83D7E80-5DC8-49AC-9FA6-D6C1A42ADAE7@gmail.com>
 <0db9cfa3-2b31-ee41-713c-889b7cc06406@lsces.co.uk> <E9DCBF61-8B3D-41C3-9D09-61C6CC8810F3@gmail.com>
 <CA+kxMuSuB7xcMYXcsVj4NDZKwBZWq3sbt2h6s9J4QxzOcfCTHg@mail.gmail.com>
 <B234C70B-2012-443B-967D-C819D65C9C5B@gmail.com> <CA+kxMuSL1kEW60S7DFJb06+r2Q3rC1ueeWU1jAP78FY65aJoDg@mail.gmail.com>
 <3C.DD.10715.4E501B95@pb1.pair.com> <CAGa2bXa4UvkL-ZsLAB2bF05L4q_oduixSzVvYzu9nddkSVttXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <93.85.10715.AB3B3B95@pb1.pair.com> <CAGa2bXYbBPwMmVegBajb4808yBasE6u9s_i99KFzqabixVy2mw@mail.gmail.com>
 <049578E9-4C9A-42D8-B206-8ABAF070E151@koalephant.com> <CAGa2bXYUV3_x+9CLR8XYW1Qn569XQQ3OoAViZZ2So-r0+XOJhw@mail.gmail.com>
 <05A8DB1C-4683-4934-A7DA-C7CD71E6CCB6@koalephant.com> <CAGa2bXa-UBSwiC-XqDievTPCQ9jHiy=TtPH=_d1qKPBYgXEMQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <3f900f87-ca88-a7e1-4c11-6263455f2039@rhsoft.net> <CAGa2bXaVb_TAvGbX4_VHA29by9OjmBjNoQYq=XOXS8b2MvZN7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 06:49:06 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXbOSwnRQC7Prfn273-mFb79v7cyLnidXELceRpQqC7qMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "lists@rhsoft.net" <lists@rhsoft.net>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114ab5d4c4bc700558f0e7fe"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] A validator module for PHP7
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

--001a114ab5d4c4bc700558f0e7fe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:35 AM, lists@rhsoft.net <lists@rhsoft.net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 11.09.2017 um 23:07 schrieb Yasuo Ohgaki
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Stephen Reay <php-lists@koalephant.co=
m
>>> >
>>>
>>>> So, you still didn=E2=80=99t actually provide an example. I *guess* yo=
u=E2=80=99re
>>>> talking
>>>> about character class validation or something else equally =E2=80=9Csi=
mple=E2=80=9D,
>>>> because I can=E2=80=99t imagine what else would be a common enough cas=
e that
>>>> you=E2=80=99d
>>>> want to have built-in rules for, and that you wouldn=E2=80=99t interna=
lly use
>>>> RegExp to test anyway.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Your request is like "Devil's Proof". Example code that cannot do thing=
s
>>> with existing API cannot exist with meaningful manner. It can be
>>> explained
>>> why it cannot, though. Try what "validate" string validator can do,
>>> Then you'll see.
>>>
>>> There is no STRING validation filter currently. This fact alone,
>>> it could be said "filter cannot do string validation currently".
>>>
>>> List of problems in current validation filter
>>>
>> but you still fail to explain why in the world you don#t try to enhance
>> the existing filter functions instead invent a new beast leading finally=
 to
>> have the existin filter functions and your new stuff which share the sam=
e
>> intention
>>
>>
> Why don't you read previous RFC and the vote result?
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/add_validate_functions_to_filter
>

I'm a bit surprised by the fact there are "filter improvement" supporters.
You should have participated in the previous RFC discussion.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net

--001a114ab5d4c4bc700558f0e7fe--