Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:100424
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.173 as permitted sender)
To: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <b92961d5-a34f-737b-896b-0d63da0f7f6b@fleshgrinder.com>
 <BY2PR02MB298C0B77E3C66533DA9F8BBAC930@BY2PR02MB298.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <9f09589f-0a8e-1b8c-7b4c-b7d6899ed4ab@fleshgrinder.com>
 <76EE812B-922D-46B4-8525-6AFA75843816@zend.com>
 <ce7dc299-929e-ad32-1db9-ffdda06c2e4c@fleshgrinder.com>
 <DM2PR02MB3023DA9D0A4E15E991BE198AC910@DM2PR02MB302.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <97cdbf8a-68b5-9cbf-ee99-47d55ae88fb6@fleshgrinder.com>
 <CA+kxMuQjGm8-socFXSL5ujoL=K670iVhi-hD0tNQaBy8dtJigg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Fleshgrinder <php@fleshgrinder.com>
Message-ID: <65a7712b-c5b4-0f32-b3fa-44c5aa9e1cb7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 12:56:00 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+kxMuQjGm8-socFXSL5ujoL=K670iVhi-hD0tNQaBy8dtJigg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] UUID
From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev)

Hi!

> That would be fine and appropriate. The RFC targets 7.3. Having a
> discussion and vote in March gives plenty of time for getting it into
> 7.3
> 
> Cancelling a vote just to avoid an RFC being rejected is (imo) playing
> slightly fast and loose with the rules.

I agree. I think the RFC itself is pretty clear. Some people agree with
the way it goes, some do not. If the latter are in majority, we should
let the vote finish, state the result as it is and then modify the RFC
(if the author or anybody else wishes, of course) according to it to
make it more acceptable, and then make another vote with the new
proposal. At least to me, it looks like most people (me included) agree
with the idea of having uuid implementation, but disagree with the
specifics of the RFC. So a modified one could have better support, but
there's no reason to not conclude the vote on the current one.

BTW, the RFC text does not have vote end date, please add it.

-- 
Stas Malyshev
smalyshev@gmail.com