Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:100341 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 12054 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2017 12:43:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Sep 2017 12:43:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=danack@basereality.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=danack@basereality.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain basereality.com from 74.125.83.51 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: danack@basereality.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.83.51 mail-pg0-f51.google.com Received: from [74.125.83.51] ([74.125.83.51:36242] helo=mail-pg0-f51.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EA/79-04538-3D559A95 for ; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 08:43:01 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id r133so302344pgr.3 for ; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 05:42:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=basereality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rJnaggBBnFENaxtBnjnExk5dtZiVXQIrQD7GIIcIkGw=; b=jMsfRjuzXzgNkRbWnS8iJnOkfr7AlgIugzcsJtesnuJLF0NajutU4c9TXc6ye6K4wW zI+uf7YCXXnTbCv5SaZYT8G2o9VspPG5wIDhZp/KhKn7RgIl3I57ThAdGjSRlOQfEWdy t8gsGwLNTcp4/5sCa6Z3DTeK8O2rlmNoHtQUbqSGxqA4mk+rg7LyIK18G30WNYw9njJi A2z+SaLy2J87/9p3MZ56OJNIe+iygifLGgpgEYg27DiXhrak+tmi159+/rrVDLBRfMfO xpB5W023YeFL8lSL2EpaUhf+zgdCUUL/gwgV09BvRZ9VtTT2u/ys5CntwpPCLupUFF2m l5Cg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rJnaggBBnFENaxtBnjnExk5dtZiVXQIrQD7GIIcIkGw=; b=PnH6SEZ3IIeIVYM58cHFqz58yaNKz0Cyn84MR/AjGOeV8RF8X7eh+wg3TVbMP8uh1I WB1HmYhnt4/5N0IhxdWFvcfvnhgJQ7/xyeE/QvNBdb3kqfBd9CVGzSrf9ZIvW1+0cnJA UrJITgv3SvziVuP8V9ybVbJPoCqZ5O7N/0YjzZUGhMPIgenVw9mk7nYuECtL7Gl9GlEV CBj9OvjHtLLkxp78iLvI0b3FBL4ULTdk9TLpkEQi/0aw4vyYvrPcFdtnub2wUnVUdKqu pNDxySCFQSZc8ZXdBgGYv9F78YoEjHQn5+IG+SITXM5YueyIvba2KJUFlEOv0KnpJxCD fxIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUi74G87wfVm02kMQCSNJ72HtQ2SeTma4NDhVFNFCBiRbIAz25Hy BcLIjhmwe+gyySNYjcuEtlqOtZdtzAAf X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb7nyyOV3cbCqWvFcbTZwWlg8SY5EM1oz+YJ/U1dwPQc9dEWBu34F+4u3YdozjKSRGBHsYhuZ79WbhCqwFSCBEI= X-Received: by 10.99.147.65 with SMTP id w1mr2322182pgm.334.1504269776836; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 05:42:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.180.133 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 05:42:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [81.143.203.71] In-Reply-To: References: <562149A0.8050504@telia.com> Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 13:42:56 +0100 Message-ID: To: Albert Casademont Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][DISCUSSION] Revisit trailing commas in function arguments From: danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd) On 1 September 2017 at 13:16, Albert Casademont wrote: > Revisiting this thread. AFAIK this RFC was never put to vote, right? > It was covered in https://wiki.php.net/rfc/list-syntax-trailing-commas which was put to a vote. Although I would like see just the trailing commas in function arguments be brought up for discussion again, without any of the other distracting stuff - like trailing commas in function declarations - it probably would be better to wait, to avoid people being annoyed by the same RFC being brought up too soon. cheers Dan