Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:100318 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 46836 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2017 15:58:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Aug 2017 15:58:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=narf@devilix.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=narf@devilix.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain devilix.net designates 74.125.82.46 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: narf@devilix.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.46 mail-wm0-f46.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.46] ([74.125.82.46:38588] helo=mail-wm0-f46.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B9/95-34801-EAD34A95 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:58:38 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id t201so6341177wmt.1 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:58:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=devilix.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nXa6UuZ2iR6j+omllH5n69rniKiVVH8kwnH0QOXUWz4=; b=Xe20N8/kotBS8Vt4TjedwMKxXTvO+teI3MPfOl0GguC7qFZ1oN8JzuoSvpoO3JlDcu +4XqLSAdPfUbHUsXvA+jzkadRwPWGtX0WnaNW/Uvi97/ve9LWXkiZHoCNH5eyY0BcSZ6 Nj0WzQ8dUVvRO0yjgv3R4vvHCRz+3SM2ypzIU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nXa6UuZ2iR6j+omllH5n69rniKiVVH8kwnH0QOXUWz4=; b=ryz42dV/hw2BwkEbMz8MH7KgTUfwAX02qNuabqyXTLu7HSVqXpIj53L3AbiNs51IRH ZaOwxFqttoG2EywuBmcBaaSaVrKvheOUJRY2lKHRS3gVtvOHoOxPOY8OSvmcE7gVAkAJ l6Tcn4tcMgdAhp3xDgr3Nb/CHU6iJZtj/RpPsZUR7mSTNGJeW4dJ0QZO9QMbWkgtOdsw MRYNch0lxeVKiQIc3uHWaK0XqAtd8jOdatB3XVscGslgmimHN1byqiGmuq3/4Os65+Oy kHfTHlSHO/AzwvysP01f4kJp0JoRcxbgn2hSEtiwQhyeuoybNWXEm5AqAAodwh0CsHBM KuWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5h4rJzuELTsmFRJs1qt4nH2hNgRHWz5ssi6WLLbHh6OlhP7NoCB O6lEWx6xsqukKqfUGfLLrEAKhFaESDHq X-Received: by 10.28.136.74 with SMTP id k71mr722545wmd.51.1503935915334; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:58:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.139.3 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:58:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 18:58:34 +0300 Message-ID: To: "Frederik Bosch | Genkgo" Cc: Sara Golemon , Lars Strojny , Dan Ackroyd , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Same Site Cookie RFC From: narf@devilix.net (Andrey Andreev) Hi Frederik, On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Frederik Bosch | Genkgo wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > While I agree on your statement that back-porting is suboptimal, I do not > agree on the fact that I said that there was no time to wait. I submitted > the RFC, awaited the opinions, changed the document according to the > different viewpoints and I link to the other RFC from this RFC. I do not > want to 'push' this through. I think we know the opinions, so it is time to > vote. If both suggestions from this RFC don't make, then people can go for > other solutions. > You did wait for, and adjust according to suggestions, I'm not questioning that. I was referring to this message: https://externals.io/message/99884#99893 If you want this to land in 7.2 (i.e. not "take a while before we see samesite cookie implemented"), then there really is no time to wait. I'm not being negative here ... I'm using this as an argument to make the vote for 7.2 now. Otherwise, we have an entire year to polish all the details in time for 7.3. Cheers, Andrey.