Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:100316 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 39739 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2017 15:23:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Aug 2017 15:23:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=narf@devilix.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=narf@devilix.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain devilix.net designates 209.85.128.173 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: narf@devilix.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.128.173 mail-wr0-f173.google.com Received: from [209.85.128.173] ([209.85.128.173:34972] helo=mail-wr0-f173.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 3D/24-34801-87534A95 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:23:37 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f173.google.com with SMTP id j29so1765798wre.2 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:23:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=devilix.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MJRk21MAExVfj4i9Sh7r7hX04Nz3yneSFXak+0jmO24=; b=g1CStdj2IGDaJemvYCgzr2G5x/HshHl7KfrYUbAB13IMJAtmFwUg3wdw7xXiBfAFb5 7Lihm4X0SPS9njGZh2b4zN7iIVvil5/NzwdwKhUiZi4Ii3IdNfLgT5nhndyfdvhDUK/u 2h9izEQAW0RtHmTRvjkDOX51t2PZdzCzkZJiQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MJRk21MAExVfj4i9Sh7r7hX04Nz3yneSFXak+0jmO24=; b=uFl3ELO+9BB8R0pKH8cGS8kKXSwF4YJ30FHQxrs2zqH5aYRhnfUVz7oE1iG2qqwkmz nnmRKYUbmLqvedRyoMXQ+xO7os9osRRpbddKbaHLQmkBqvku+mQadr1EKKTXWueXfiKg oVuYvQphXnP7atIbu3BglMlMdSGOttFBl6iRUIIg/PHUGNwLMEp8V6wD2tOibKsHNh2R AMV62z4m1KdbwfR0+IqEpLY886PqkNrXtdKMS7zFQ26MmcdPvjzty/VCYLhEBzluO1TN +W12CrxZhezrbccNrrzD2/JFn4QBA/6Gig1z41JcUXMjM3NWIx2sxed1ywG43X/V8NfB XgXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5jHd0cCzNWy7esMH+20lkw/CVq4R80Um71cNdMa9hZ65hDQnbVQ rOBDDkf9aViy89VaYulnc4sFysad3iBl X-Received: by 10.223.130.21 with SMTP id 21mr730290wrb.243.1503933813350; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:23:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.139.3 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:23:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 18:23:32 +0300 Message-ID: To: Sara Golemon Cc: Lars Strojny , Frederik Bosch , Dan Ackroyd , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Same Site Cookie RFC From: narf@devilix.net (Andrey Andreev) Hi, On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Sara Golemon wrote: > On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Lars Strojny wrote: >> Sounds good! Let's vote in getting it in first and then we can have a 2nd RFC (and vote) if it should land in 7.2 >> > Mmmm, not quite. IF you want to aim for 7.2, do it now in the same > vote. Back porting is sub-optimal and there's not a rush to land it > on 7.3. The time sensitive part is 7.2. > I second this. In fact, there was a competing idea/RFC when the discussion started, but the author of this one insisted that there's no time to wait for that. To me, it doesn't make sense to rush this (compared to alternative ideas) if it doesn't get into 7.2. Cheers, Andrey.