Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:100315 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29919 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2017 15:05:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Aug 2017 15:05:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@golemon.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@golemon.com; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain golemon.com does not designate 209.85.128.171 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@golemon.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.128.171 mail-wr0-f171.google.com Received: from [209.85.128.171] ([209.85.128.171:36031] helo=mail-wr0-f171.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 88/F1-34801-C1134A95 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:05:00 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-f171.google.com with SMTP id p14so2502791wrg.3 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:05:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=golemon-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=t71ND28urrX0O4w82ALjgVEAas+hkEzKmp8TL70iLLs=; b=v4VZQ9Gsg0EBtbsSp0EdFsOjiqPqhN6JGin4J75atRNfP5jcf8IFwvB3yVCn9Dhvkm PGm3syHREe+oj/HpTju5tnAk5SEBbZfgcNnL7VuzD85MXLfrSTMkV65qVNqcGRSliO7h IMCgkAYigZ3L69rPulnz3hL+Jm+S1bHeTForGXKj1yyclBOhc6COg5VA7lCWi6Vtdk4C RtQ5r17LVuOFkc8gXcKLSyW9aUhONo+126WPHRDu4HDzhFm8ZzObJEePpB9yNU4oiYII rcZqbXhkUdKag1LGyNyB1B8PE4LWs6Bkr3w8JWuvVCwoACl4XGOGe2rZ9RGbiSSg+JEi 5wqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=t71ND28urrX0O4w82ALjgVEAas+hkEzKmp8TL70iLLs=; b=J740T6S1+GCtAklxLdsEPdIf7PMhR3ZmvVcEaFKSdIpiBQV/YN9aHcYlQiQfohaH6C 5bm4k5/zelSYuJyhkoMoufJ2G3P7k9wTxVhlKKPhdYnWCdGZc1rslUlzrnVqz2RDxhtM 0qRDjKlxFBsMERbhFCpQ8wiUbYpmS6udDsilWdmdba+zf04BfIOpohDuy5W+kbi2I6CT 4edw2i6zE45/3ae8LFrR/NZwEITNh7SwsNM/5bkoOEGPuGtcGbcizZKkdEKEk4s/0SHq x3ZUGFQMF2Lbb3bffJ6mlltb8C0sfjmqMjCY4vZTwi8elPpZCQd74W5kEEv6aH4W7EVW HBjg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5i7lD+igp5WoC0M2djyhAQeB7ZeCgOSjUzKrUiUGHexAwgMHysq yWgYD6hBr6B4NewBIghPcpdQPkeSLuhw X-Received: by 10.223.149.39 with SMTP id 36mr690503wrs.280.1503932697380; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:04:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: php@golemon.com Received: by 10.223.169.234 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:04:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [206.252.215.26] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:04:56 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: FWCqMiSc2IKuPG6OQB7l9y_6QWA Message-ID: To: Lars Strojny Cc: Frederik Bosch , Dan Ackroyd , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Same Site Cookie RFC From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon) On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Lars Strojny wrote: > Sounds good! Let's vote in getting it in first and then we can have a 2nd RFC (and vote) if it should land in 7.2 > Mmmm, not quite. IF you want to aim for 7.2, do it now in the same vote. Back porting is sub-optimal and there's not a rush to land it on 7.3. The time sensitive part is 7.2. FTR, I'll be voting "No" on a 7.2, and I've already submitted my yes vote for 7.3 (options array variant). -Sara