Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:100283
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.128.176 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e52aa112ca7aa2fa041a40b5eb2dc729@bohwaz.net>
References: <1e398f12adbdbed6b7caf3b0af07f284@bohwaz.net> <CADxrgCOVu8+91THShrpGLvzqRKBr7URm69s792K2Ufi=GxoTSw@mail.gmail.com>
 <069c08bfe15b856007debab5d0d961be@bohwaz.net> <CADyq6sKDTp02dk816_2pqaFFRa5kEwXa=8AcjsD=UhZ7dgSmHw@mail.gmail.com>
 <e52aa112ca7aa2fa041a40b5eb2dc729@bohwaz.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 06:31:08 +0200
Message-ID: <CADyq6sKFgAy7M=wN+2YxHmcHh5pYrgEgkueR4EDYN+2Pt1GZTg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "BohwaZ/PHP" <php@bohwaz.net>
Cc: PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11461b986917ad0557642eeb"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Matching PDO_SQLite features with SQLite3 extension
From: ocramius@gmail.com (Marco Pivetta)

--001a11461b986917ad0557642eeb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

PDO is already a mess, and adding method that appear/disappear dynamically
whether you enable an extension or not... is a horror show.

From my PoV, since we (doctrine) have to abstract away from it all the
time, we'd rather have it as tidy and well-thought-out as possible,
especially since there already is so much damage done.

Couldn't care less about exposed/unexposed features if the endpoints are on
the wrong object, or cause even more weirdness to work with. It is not
helpful: it's just more tech debt dumped on millions of consumers.


On 23 Aug 2017 4:39 AM, "BohwaZ/PHP" <php@bohwaz.net> wrote:

> Yes, because once it lands in core, it sticks around for almost eternity.
>>
>
> Yeah but is it necessary for something that is just missing, because the
> pdo_sqlite implementation is incomplete, and is basically following what
> already exists, without changing anything?
>
> That change was implemented in the SQLite3 extension without a RFC, so I'm
> quite confused here.
>
> I kinda feel like it's a weird thing to submit an RFC that would basically
> ask the question "should pdo_sqlite only implement a subset of SQLite",
> because well it is most likely that if you are using a DB driver with PDO
> you most likely want to be able to access that DB features, no?
>
> Or are you saying that we should have a vote on whether the implementation
> should follow what is already existing in PDO or should propose something
> new instead? Because I frankly don't know what would be a better idea than
> driver-specific methods and I don't know enough C/have enough time to do
> anything else, so I won't submit any proposition that I won't be able to do
> myself.
>
> Cheers.
>

--001a11461b986917ad0557642eeb--