Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:100282 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57862 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2017 02:39:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Aug 2017 02:39:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@bohwaz.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@bohwaz.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain bohwaz.net designates 5.135.163.151 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@bohwaz.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 5.135.163.151 sanguine.kd2.org Received: from [5.135.163.151] ([5.135.163.151:51666] helo=mail.kd2.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 75/C9-34801-ECAEC995 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 22:39:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bohwaz.net; s=mail; h=Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:From:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:To; bh=K19X6w/sZUVx5Jtacm1v92cA9IZclZX/Rshzq0FRcpU=; b=aPn+/Kxj+NKRdm56dKazKpjIznFrEkh5dQEe557gs6p3cW1GkeRi/p37nY8rG4KXxtVqy9352sNYU2KkNUURAHXd67ij3YqztQd7QSUE0ntn1AgrQV2Z3uAgWb+sew4OGKLpVAXhbzcFvSk4ZVjbnB0FUMtjUUsdBNG91bThP+w=; Received: from narragoon by mail.kd2.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dkLZT-0005Je-BB; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 04:39:07 +0200 To: Marco Pivetta X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 14:39:07 +1200 Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: References: <1e398f12adbdbed6b7caf3b0af07f284@bohwaz.net> <069c08bfe15b856007debab5d0d961be@bohwaz.net> Message-ID: X-Sender: php@bohwaz.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.5 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Matching PDO_SQLite features with SQLite3 extension From: php@bohwaz.net (BohwaZ/PHP) > Yes, because once it lands in core, it sticks around for almost > eternity. Yeah but is it necessary for something that is just missing, because the pdo_sqlite implementation is incomplete, and is basically following what already exists, without changing anything? That change was implemented in the SQLite3 extension without a RFC, so I'm quite confused here. I kinda feel like it's a weird thing to submit an RFC that would basically ask the question "should pdo_sqlite only implement a subset of SQLite", because well it is most likely that if you are using a DB driver with PDO you most likely want to be able to access that DB features, no? Or are you saying that we should have a vote on whether the implementation should follow what is already existing in PDO or should propose something new instead? Because I frankly don't know what would be a better idea than driver-specific methods and I don't know enough C/have enough time to do anything else, so I won't submit any proposition that I won't be able to do myself. Cheers.