Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:123181
Message-ID: <1cc7c609-0c12-4050-b792-2f4077a6ae69@scriptfusion.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 14:04:59 +0100
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PDO subclass names
To: Stephen Reay <php-lists@koalephant.com>, Lynn <kjarli@gmail.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
References: <CANS-=pfcqB5=dw45gwPjor6-9z-bG3Kv+sYwDgLbbRx8avOQcQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <0892FAA2-9305-4B52-BA84-440EA6044ABA@koalephant.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <0892FAA2-9305-4B52-BA84-440EA6044ABA@koalephant.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: bilge@scriptfusion.com (Bilge)

On 23/04/2024 10:25, Stephen Reay wrote:
> The argument that "Client" is meaningless becomes pretty moot when you 
> realise that you can import a *namespace* and use it relatively, if 
> you so wish:
>
> ```
> import MyLib\HTTP;
>
> $a = new HTTP\Client(...);
> ```

Hi Stephen,

Granted, but I also believe the user can and should have the reasonable 
expectation that they can work comfortably (without conflicts or 
aliases) using leaf (class) names exclusively.

Kind regards,
Bilge